The story of “enlightenment” may not be recognised for what it is
when it appears because it will not meet your previous expectations
about what it should be.
There are identities that the body/mind (or whatever you want to call it)
likes to attach to and claim in order to validate it’s existence.
Always re-introducing it’s existence to itself and placing itself in a story.
Moving toward pleasure,
and avoiding pain.
“I am a good person”
“I am a spiritual person”
“I am an enlightened person”
But then,
how others see us,
or how we appear in their story is also true.
No matter what it is,
there is a perceiving of our existence
within what is happening there (in their story
as a palette for their projection)
that is just as valid.
“I am stupid”
“I am arrogant”
“I am an asshole”
(I) have to be for them what they perceive me to be.
It is a role that must be filled.
What we are is always changing.
We are looking for security and safety
by claiming adjectives
that label this human mind,
so that we can reinforce our individuality.
It is an “individual” world.
But who we are is always changing.
What we think we know is always changing.
Our reality is always changing.
There is absolutely nothing that we can place
our hand upon and say “This is it!”
It will always find its own contradiction
and create another labyrinth.
Even for those who claim liberation or enlightenment
find that speaking about anything that
wants to be known by the mind
will become a concept.
Non duality is a concept.
Enlightenment is a concept.
And the story that appears, once
our true nature has been seen,
is no more relevant than the life of a stone.